← Back to Logical Deduction · Guides
Darii Syllogism
A valid syllogism with particular conclusion: All A are B, Some C are A, therefore Some C are B.
Learn
A valid syllogism with particular conclusion: All A are B, Some C are A, therefore Some C are B.
Darii is a first-figure syllogism that derives a particular affirmative (I) conclusion from a universal affirmative (A) major premise and a particular affirmative (I) minor premise. The name 'Darii' uses vowels A-I-I. Unlike Barbara, Darii only claims that 'some' members of a category have a property, making it useful when we know partial overlap rather than complete inclusion.
All M are P, Some S are M ⊢ Some S are P
- All birds can fly. Some pets are birds. Therefore, some pets can fly.
- All prime numbers greater than 2 are odd. Some integers are prime numbers greater than 2. Therefore, some integers are odd.
- All doctors have medical degrees. Some volunteers are doctors. Therefore, some volunteers have medical degrees.
How to recognize it
- Major premise uses 'All' (universal affirmative)
- Minor premise uses 'Some' (particular affirmative)
- Conclusion uses 'Some' - you cannot conclude 'All' from partial evidence
Common mistakes
- Over-generalizing: concluding 'All' when only 'Some' is warranted
- Confusing with invalid forms where the middle term is not distributed
Step-by-step walkthrough
All doctors have medical degrees. Some volunteers are doctors. What can we conclude?
- Identify universal premise: 'All doctors have medical degrees'
- Identify particular premise: 'Some volunteers are doctors'
- Those volunteers who are doctors must have medical degrees
- Conclude with 'Some' (not 'All'): Some volunteers have medical degrees
Answer: Some volunteers have medical degrees