Advertisement
← Back to Logical Deduction · Guides
Ferio Syllogism
A valid syllogism: No A are B, Some C are A, therefore Some C are not B.
Learn
A valid syllogism: No A are B, Some C are A, therefore Some C are not B.
Ferio is the fourth 'perfect' syllogism of the first figure. It combines a universal negative (E) major premise with a particular affirmative (I) minor premise to derive a particular negative (O) conclusion. The name 'Ferio' uses vowels E-I-O to indicate proposition types. It allows us to conclude that some members of a category lack a property based on their membership in an excluded class.
No M are P, Some S are M ⊢ Some S are not P
- No reptiles are warm-blooded. Some pets are reptiles. Therefore, some pets are not warm-blooded.
- No vegetables contain cholesterol. Some foods I eat are vegetables. Therefore, some foods I eat do not contain cholesterol.
- No beginners pass the advanced test. Some students are beginners. Therefore, some students do not pass the advanced test.
How to recognize it
- Major premise uses 'No' (universal negative)
- Minor premise uses 'Some' (particular affirmative)
- Conclusion uses 'Some...not' (particular negative)
Common mistakes
- Concluding 'No C are B' instead of 'Some C are not B' - over-generalizing from partial evidence
- Misreading 'Some C are not B' as 'Some C are B' (opposite meaning)
Step-by-step walkthrough
No reptiles are warm-blooded. Some pets are reptiles. What can we conclude?
- Identify universal negative: 'No reptiles are warm-blooded'
- Identify particular affirmative: 'Some pets are reptiles'
- Those pets that are reptiles cannot be warm-blooded
- Conclude: Some pets are not warm-blooded
Answer: Some pets are not warm-blooded
Practice guidance
Advertisement